Maxkamad Federaal ah oo laga codsaday inay joojiso amarka labaad ee Trump ee danta jinsiyadda dhalka
Koox qareen ah oo hore u guulaysatay ka-hortagga amarkii ugu horreeyay ee Trump ee jinsiyadda dhalka ayaa maxkamad federaal ah ka codsatay inay caddeyso in go'aankii Maxkamadda Sare uu sidoo kale xannibayo amar labaad. Amarkaasi wuxuu la saxeexan yahay toddobaadkii la soo dhaafay.
Dacwadda ACLU iyo dalabyada maxkamadda
Qareennada Ururka Xuquuqda Madaniga ah ee ACLU ayaa dhaqaaq maxkamadeed ka gudbiyay goor dhowaan ah maxkamadda degmada federaalka ee New Hampshire, iyagoo doonaya amar caddeyn ah oo sheegaya in amarka cusub uu si toos ah u diidan yahay go'aankii Maxkamadda Sare. Talaadadii ayaa qareennadu dacwadda gudbiyeen.
ACLU waxay maxkamadda ku doodaysaa in qodobbada amarka Trump uu qeexay aysan ku jirin dastuurka ama sharciga jinsiyadda federaalka, waxayna raadineysaa in la joojiyo amarkaas. Qareennadu waxay qoreen: "Nothing requires this Court to countenance the continued assault on this foundational constitutional principle or issue an endless string of EO-specific injunctions."
Go'aankii Maxkamadda Sare iyo xaddiga jinsiyadda
Maxkamadda Sare waxay xaqiijisay afar qaybood oo carruurta dhulka Mareykanka ku dhasha aan si otomaatig ah u helin jinsiyadda: carruurta safiirrada, kuwa maraakiibta shisheeye ku dhasha, kuwa cadawga dhulka qabsaday iyo xubnaha qabiilooyinka Hindida. Go'aanku wuxuu ahaa 6-3.
Garsooraha Brett Kavanaugh ayaa qoray ra'yigiisa ku raacan in xeerarku "indicated that the four exceptions were a closed set," oo macnaheedu yahay in aanay jirin wax ka-reeb aan dheeraad ahayn. Garsooraha John Roberts wuxuu qoray in jinsiyaddu ay tahay "fixed by the place of nativity, irrespective of parentage."
Amarka labaad iyo doodaha maamulka
Amarka labaad ee Trump wuxuu isku dayayaa inuu diido jinsiyadda carruurta dhulka Mareykanka ku dhasha ee waalidkood yahay "alien enemy," ama "shaqaale dowladda shisheeye," ama qof ku hawlgeliya "commercial transaction" ama ku dhasha dhul aan sharcigu jinsiyad siin. Amarku wuxuu shaqaynayaa Sebt. 6.
Maamulka ayaa ku doodaya in qaybaha amarka labaad ay yihiin ka-reeb sharci ah oo hoos yimaada fasirkii Roberts. ACLU waxay ku doodaysaa inaysan ka mid ahayn dastuurka, waxayna rabtaa in la joojiyo. Qareennadu waxay yiraahdeen: "The court should make clear that [Trump] may not take away class members' birthright under the auspices of these or any other executive actions."
The same legal team that successfully challenged Trump's first attempt to end birthright citizenship has asked a federal judge to block a second executive order, arguing it defies the Supreme Court's June ruling.
Legal Challenge Filed in New Hampshire
Attorneys for the American Civil Liberties Union filed a motion in federal district court in New Hampshire on Tuesday, seeking a declaratory order that the new executive order effectively defies the Supreme Court's ruling.
The ACLU argued that none of the exemptions specified in the order appear in the Constitution or federal citizenship law, and urged the court to clarify that Trump cannot strip birthright citizenship through executive actions.
Supreme Court's Narrow Exemptions
The Supreme Court confirmed four categories of children born on U.S. soil who would not automatically become citizens: the children of ambassadors, those born on foreign public ships, those born to enemies occupying American territory, and members of Indian tribes.
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote in a concurring opinion that the four exceptions were a closed set, meaning no additional exceptions can be recognized based on subsequent circumstances or developments.
Administration's Defense and Timeline
The administration argues that the categories specified in Trump's second executive order are acceptable exemptions from birthright citizenship under the legal interpretation presented by Chief Justice John Roberts.
The president's executive order is set to take effect on Sept. 6, and the ACLU's motion seeks to prevent its implementation by establishing that it violates the Supreme Court's precedent.
