New Jersey waxay ka codsatay Maxkamadda Sare inay go'aansato haddii Kalshi ay ku baxdo shuruucda ciyaaraha barwaaqo-sooranka
New Jersey ayaa maanta ka codsatay Maxkamadda Sare ee Mareykanka inay go'aansato haddii shuruucda ciyaaraha barwaaqo-sooranka ee dowladaha laga raadin karo suuqyada hor-jeedinta sida Kalshi, iyadoo ay sheegtay in shirkaduhu ay diidan yihiin shuruucda dowladaha.
New Jersey waxay codsatay Maxkamadda Sare
New Jersey ayaa maanta ka codsatay Maxkamadda Sare ee Mareykanka inay go'aansato haddii shuruucda ciyaaraha barwaaqo-sooranka ee dowladaha laga raadin karo suuqyada hor-jeedinta sida Kalshi, iyadoo ay sheegtay in shirkaduhu ay diidan yihiin shuruucda dowladaha. Wasiirka Guud ee New Jersey, Jennifer Davenport, ayaa sheegtay in shirkadaha sida Kalshi ay sheegaan inay bixiyaan ciyaaraha barwaaqo-sooranka ee dhammaan 50-ka dowlad, balse ay diidan yihiin shuruucda ciyaaraha dowladaha.
New Jersey waxay sheegtay in arrintu ay tahay mid muhiim ah oo macnaha iyo sharciga ku saabsan: Kalshi waxay doonaysaa inay dowlad-goboleedka u bedesho suuqa ciyaaraha barwaaqo-sooranka ee dhaqaalaha badan, iyadoo ay sheegtay in go'aanka Maxkamadda 3-aad ee Dhaqaalaha uu ahaa mid khaldan. New Jersey waxay codsatay in Maxkamadda Sare ay ka hadasho su'aasha ay kala duwan yihiin maxkamadaha dalka oo dhan: haddii suuqyada hor-jeedinta ay bixiyaan ciyaaraha barwaaqo-sooranka iyagoo aan raacin shuruucda dowladaha.
Maxkamadaha kala duwan iyo khilaafka
Maxkamadda 3-aad ee Dhaqaalaha ee Mareykanka ayaa April-ka go'aamisay in New Jersey ay uusan uusan ka ilaalin ciyaaraha barwaaqo-sooranka ee suuqyada hor-jeedinta, iyadoo ay sheegtay in heshiisyada ciyaaraha ay ku xiran yihiin shuruucda 'swap' ee CFTC. Maxkamadda 9-aad ee Dhaqaalaha ayaa sidoo kale go'aamisay in Nevada ay ka hortagto Kalshi inay bixiso ciyaaraha barwaaqo-sooranka, iyadoo ay sheegtay in ciyaaraha barwaaqo-sooranka ee loo yaqaan 'swap' ay yihiin kuwo kale oo ciyaaraha barwaaqo-sooranka ah.
Khilaafka maxkamadaha ayaa muhiim u ah, sababtoo ah wuxuu go'aamiyaa haddii suuqa ciyaaraha barwaaqo-sooranka ee dhaqaalaha badan uu u fududeeyaa inuu shaqeeyo iyadoo aan raacin shuruucda dowladaha. New Jersey waxay sheegtay in khilaafka maxkamadaha uu muhiim u yahay, sababtoo ah wuxuu go'aamiyaa haddii suuqa ciyaaraha barwaaqo-sooranka uu u fududeeyaa inuu shaqeeyo iyadoo aan raacin shuruucda dowladaha. Davenport waxay sheegtay in khilaafka maxkamadaha uu muhiim u yahay, sababtoo ah wuxuu go'aamiyaa haddii suuqa ciyaaraha barwaaqo-sooranka uu u fududeeyaa inuu shaqeeyo iyadoo aan raacin shuru
Dhaq-dhaqaaqa khilaafka iyo xaaladda
Davenport waxay sheegtay in khilaafka maxkamadaha uu muhiim u yahay, sababtoo ah wuxuu go'aamiyaa haddii suuqa ciyaaraha barwaaqo-sooranka uu u fududeeyaa inuu shaqeeyo iyadoo aan raacin shuruucda dowladaha. Waxay sidoo kale sheegtay in khilaafka maxkamadaha uu muhiim u yahay, sababtoo ah wuxuu go'aamiyaa haddii suuqa ciyaaraha barwaaqo-sooranka uu u fududeeyaa inuu shaqeeyo iyadoo aan raacin shuruucda dowladaha. New Jersey waxay codsatay in Maxkamadda Sare ay ka hadasho su'aasha ay kala duwan yihiin maxkamadaha dalka oo dhan: haddii suuqyada hor-jeedinta ay bixiyaan ciyaaraha barwaaqo-soorank
Davenport waxay sheegtay in khilaafka maxkamadaha uu muhiim u yahay, sababtoo ah wuxuu go'aamiyaa haddii suuqa ciyaaraha barwaaqo-sooranka uu u fududeeyaa inuu shaqeeyo iyadoo aan raacin shuruucda dowladaha. Waxay sidoo kale sheegtay in khilaafka maxkamadaha uu muhiim u yahay, sababtoo ah wuxuu go'aamiyaa haddii suuqa ciyaaraha barwaaqo-sooranka uu u fududeeyaa inuu shaqeeyo iyadoo aan raacin shuruucda dowladaha. New Jersey waxay codsatay in Maxkamadda Sare ay ka hadasho su'aasha ay kala duwan yihiin maxkamadaha dalka oo dhan: haddii suuqyada hor-jeedinta ay bixiyaan ciyaaraha barwaaqo-soorank
New Jersey has formally asked the US Supreme Court to resolve a critical legal conflict over whether prediction markets like Kalshi can offer sports wagers without following state gambling laws, arguing that the company is attempting to federalize a multi-billion-dollar industry at the expense of state authority.
New Jersey Challenges Federal Jurisdiction Over Sports Betting
New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport announced the petition, stating that companies like Kalshi claim to offer legal sports betting in all 50 states but refuse to follow the gambling laws of any state. The petition argues that the issue carries tremendous practical and legal consequence, as Kalshi seeks to federalize the multi-billion-dollar sports betting industry at the expense of every state sports gaming law.
This is the first certiorari petition filed with the US Supreme Court regarding the legality of this business model, which involves offering sports wagers self-certified by Kalshi with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission without following state laws. Davenport's office emphasized that litigation has erupted across at least 20 states, with dozens of active suits pending and the gambling laws of several states currently enjoined by federal courts.
Circuit Split Raises Odds of Supreme Court Intervention
The petition highlights a dramatic split between federal appeals courts. In April, the US Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit ruled that New Jersey cannot regulate sports bets on prediction markets, determining that sports-related event contracts meet the legal definition of swaps, giving the CFTC exclusive jurisdiction. Conversely, the 9th Circuit appeals court ruled that Nevada can stop Kalshi from allowing sports bets, concluding that sports betting labeled as swaps is simply gambling with a different name.
New Jersey's petition noted that this circuit split has tremendous importance, as it will determine whether a multi-billion-dollar gaming industry can suddenly operate free from state sports-gaming laws. The division dramatically raised the odds that the Supreme Court will step in to resolve the conflict, although Kalshi reportedly said it will not allow bets on the case.
Nationwide Legal Battle Over Prediction Market Sports Wagers
Davenport's office described the situation as a question that divided courts nationwide, asking the Supreme Court to hear whether prediction markets can offer sports wagers without following state sports-gambling laws. The petition stressed that the decision by the 3rd Circuit is badly mistaken and that the company's actions undermine the regulatory frameworks established by individual states.
The legal landscape remains uncertain as multiple states pursue their own remedies. The petition underscores the urgency of the matter, noting that the Supreme Court's intervention could set a precedent affecting the entire sports betting industry and the balance of power between federal and state authorities.
Ilaha iyo xuquuqda sawirka
Sawir: Ars Technica Xigasho
